Curious about the effectiveness of censorship. Are you aware of the October 14th article that was both published by the NY Post and completely blocked by both facebook and twitter? If so, do you believe facebook and twitter crossed the line from provider of computer service to publisher?
If you are aware of the article and wanted to read it, were you able to find it? (when I used google to search for "new york post article laptop" the article didn't appear within the first 5 pages of the search results, only follow-up articles on from the 15th and 18th)
"The law states: "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."
...There are two primary camps here. One thinks that Section 230 demands neutrality from tech platforms as a predicate for immunity. The other thinks that the provision completely frees tech companies from responsibility for moderating content on their platforms."
#bigtech
#censorship
https://psmag.com/social-justice/what-if-we-treated-facebook-like-a-publisher
Facebook allows kittens, but not info on their competitors. I can share other posts from my blog, but not this one, even after using their "linter" to fix the problem.
(I added the word kittens to my facebook post on purpose. and the filename of the attached image has the word kitten in it.)
kitten. kittens. #kittensoffacebook
kitten.
Mom is mom, no matter how old you are. 😂🤣
https://twitter.com/Rickfromtheteam/status/1321810819995324418